<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parallax View &#187; Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parallax-view.org/category/commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parallax-view.org</link>
	<description>Smart Words About Cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:23:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And the Oscar goes to &#8230; who, us?!</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2012/03/03/and-the-oscar-goes-to-who-us/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2012/03/03/and-the-oscar-goes-to-who-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard T. Jameson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Richard T. Jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Baxter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=10515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, we&#8217;re past the point when anything more needs to be said about the 84th Oscars, and yet I&#8217;ve seen no mention of the most wackily wonderful moment of the evening. It afforded a look inside Academy ritual, and an instance of late-blooming justice being done against considerable odds. So please indulge one last Oscar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2012/03/03/and-the-oscar-goes-to-who-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War of the Rings: Is the new &#8220;Lord of the Rings&#8221; Blu-ray the One True Edition?</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2011/06/28/war-of-the-rings-is-the-new-lord-of-the-rings-blu-ray-the-one-true-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2011/06/28/war-of-the-rings-is-the-new-lord-of-the-rings-blu-ray-the-one-true-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Axmaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Sean Axmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Controversies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fellowship of the Ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings Extended Edition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=8606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has Sauron struck again? From the furious debates playing across DVD/Blu-ray forums, where some the most passionate fans and exacting collectors can be found registering their praise and displeasures with upcoming and new releases (often in hyperbolic dimensions and a hostile tone), you might assume that there&#8217;s a new war brewing over the fate of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2011/06/28/war-of-the-rings-is-the-new-lord-of-the-rings-blu-ray-the-one-true-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Shrinking Man&#8217; reputation grows</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2011/06/27/shrinking-man-reputation-grows/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2011/06/27/shrinking-man-reputation-grows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hartl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by John Hartl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Zugsmith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Sirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Arnold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Stuart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Matheson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Incredible Shrinking Man]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=8589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s always gratifying when a favorite film is discovered—or rediscovered in a way that creates a fresh perspective . Such is the case with 1957’s The Incredible Shrinking Man, which was enthusiastically received in its time but continues to grow in stature. Last year, it joined the National Film Registry of significant American films. In [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2011/06/27/shrinking-man-reputation-grows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Academy Awards: finished business</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2011/03/02/2010-academy-awards-finished-business/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2011/03/02/2010-academy-awards-finished-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard T. Jameson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Richard T. Jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=7595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I told a friend I wasn&#8217;t anticipating Oscar night all that much this year. Then I immediately emended that: No, I was anticipating Oscar night all too well. There was little room for doubt who or what was going to win, and the outlook wasn&#8217;t prepossessing. As I wrote here several weeks ago, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2011/03/02/2010-academy-awards-finished-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tear sheets</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2010/11/22/tear-sheets/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2010/11/22/tear-sheets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard T. Jameson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Richard T. Jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bergman Fellini Kurosawa: The Foreign Film in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James N. Selvidge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=6479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the age of Netflix, when just about any film made anywhere can be summoned painlessly to your mailbox [or streamed to your flatscreen], we do well to remember that once upon a time there were only a handful of independently operated movie theaters in the United States dedicated to showing foreign-language cinema. Prints were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2010/11/22/tear-sheets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is Not a Watchman Review</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2009/03/05/this-is-not-a-watchman-review/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2009/03/05/this-is-not-a-watchman-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Axmaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Sean Axmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watchmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zach Snyder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=1758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[published in conjunction with the blog seanax.com] The world doesn&#8217;t need another Watchmen review. Everyone with access to a preview screening and a web page has already done one. The world is not short of opinions and the web doesn&#8217;t seem to differentiate between considered responses and emotional reflex put to words, though you can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2009/03/05/this-is-not-a-watchman-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last list of Lists for 2008 &#8211; The Year in Cinema</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2009/01/25/the-last-list-of-lists-for-2008-the-year-in-cinema/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2009/01/25/the-last-list-of-lists-for-2008-the-year-in-cinema/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Axmaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Andrew Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by John Hartl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Kathleen Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Richard T. Jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Robert C. Cumbow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Robert Horton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Sean Axmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=1416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reading of the Oscar nominations marks the unofficial (and long overdue) end to the season of Top Ten lists and year-in-review pieces and various awards bestowed by every group who wants to add their stamp to the passports of Oscar hopefuls. So as a postscript, I gather a few lists and remarks from Parallax [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2009/01/25/the-last-list-of-lists-for-2008-the-year-in-cinema/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seattle Post-Intelligencer: Up For Sale, Up in the Air</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2009/01/10/seattle-post-intelligencer-up-for-sale-up-in-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2009/01/10/seattle-post-intelligencer-up-for-sale-up-in-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Axmaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Sean Axmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Published in conjunction with the blog seanax.com] You could say it came as a complete surprise when, on Thursday evening, local TV station KING-TV announced that, according to unnamed sources, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer would be put up for sale. The P-I staff had no news of it and the Hearst Corporation, which owns the P-I, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2009/01/10/seattle-post-intelligencer-up-for-sale-up-in-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skolimowski: &#8220;Barrier&#8221; ( &#8220;Bariera&#8221;)</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2008/10/15/skolimowski-barrier-bariera/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2008/10/15/skolimowski-barrier-bariera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard T. Jameson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Richard T. Jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerzy Skolimowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Originally written for theÂ University of Washington Office of Cinema Studies Film Series "Voices and Visions," April 20, 1982] Tight shot: a man&#8217;s back, naked, bent, straining; his bands tied behind him; his head, whether yearning forward or bowed in fear and trembling, unseen. The posture faintly evokes your basic bullet-in-the-back-of-the-neck, Darkness at Noonâ€“style execution. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2008/10/15/skolimowski-barrier-bariera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Art, Life and Politics</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2008/09/04/art-life-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://parallax-view.org/2008/09/04/art-life-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Sheila Benson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art, Life and Politics With the arrival of Sarah Palin, American politics has strayed deep into Wag the Dog territory, but it wasnâ€™t until last night, as even ad hoc members of Alaskaâ€™s First Family were lined up for her speech, that I realized that if I were Levi Johnston, I&#8217;d be very, very worried. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://parallax-view.org/2008/09/04/art-life-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

