<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek &#8211; Not So Boldly Going</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parallax-view.org/2009/05/07/star-trek-not-so-boldly-going/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parallax-view.org/2009/05/07/star-trek-not-so-boldly-going/</link>
	<description>Smart Words About Cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEFF</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2009/05/07/star-trek-not-so-boldly-going/comment-page-1/#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>JEFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=2224#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>MY STANDARD COMPLAINT ABOUT MOVIES TODAY IS: THEY SPENT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS ON SPECIAL EFFECTS AND THEN USE A SCRIPT WRITTEN BY COMIC BOOK WRITERS. QUITE A FEW OF THE 5 TV SERIES EPISODES HAD A BETTER STORYLINE THAN THIS MOVIE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY STANDARD COMPLAINT ABOUT MOVIES TODAY IS: THEY SPENT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS ON SPECIAL EFFECTS AND THEN USE A SCRIPT WRITTEN BY COMIC BOOK WRITERS. QUITE A FEW OF THE 5 TV SERIES EPISODES HAD A BETTER STORYLINE THAN THIS MOVIE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2009/05/07/star-trek-not-so-boldly-going/comment-page-1/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=2224#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>[&quot;Below Wrath of Khan, definitely, but the same could be said of most blockbusters.&quot;]


I am not a big fan of STAR TREK.  In fact, I consider it to be one of the most badly written films, this summer.  But I&#039;m a little perplexed by the above statement.  Are you trying to hint that 1982&#039;s WRATH OF KHAN is the standard that most TREK films should attain?  Or most summer blockbuster movies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>["Below Wrath of Khan, definitely, but the same could be said of most blockbusters."]</p>
<p>I am not a big fan of STAR TREK.  In fact, I consider it to be one of the most badly written films, this summer.  But I&#8217;m a little perplexed by the above statement.  Are you trying to hint that 1982&#8242;s WRATH OF KHAN is the standard that most TREK films should attain?  Or most summer blockbuster movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

