<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Praise of &#8220;Doubt&#8221; in the Certainty of Cinema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parallax-view.org/2008/12/22/in-praise-of-doubt-in-the-certainty-of-cinema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parallax-view.org/2008/12/22/in-praise-of-doubt-in-the-certainty-of-cinema/</link>
	<description>Smart Words About Cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Levitt</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2008/12/22/in-praise-of-doubt-in-the-certainty-of-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Levitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=1103#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Thank you for &quot;getting it right&quot;. Too many of the reviews of this movie focused on the &quot;who-dunnit&quot; unresolved mystery of this piece. The truth as you say is that it actually challenges the viewer to assess our own projections (conscious or unconscious) filters through which we see the world. For example, if this movie was made 20 years ago, before the scandal, consensus by viewers would likely overwhelmingly be with the priest. We are accustom to certainty in the movies, as if our right is to have one domain - unlike real life - where we know what really happened and what it means. We don&#039;t have that right, but we do have the opportunity to understand ourselves better through the Rorschach/ Thanks for getting it right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for &#8220;getting it right&#8221;. Too many of the reviews of this movie focused on the &#8220;who-dunnit&#8221; unresolved mystery of this piece. The truth as you say is that it actually challenges the viewer to assess our own projections (conscious or unconscious) filters through which we see the world. For example, if this movie was made 20 years ago, before the scandal, consensus by viewers would likely overwhelmingly be with the priest. We are accustom to certainty in the movies, as if our right is to have one domain &#8211; unlike real life &#8211; where we know what really happened and what it means. We don&#8217;t have that right, but we do have the opportunity to understand ourselves better through the Rorschach/ Thanks for getting it right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2008/12/22/in-praise-of-doubt-in-the-certainty-of-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 04:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=1103#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. I was surprised to find that I was so drawn into the film and so caught up in my almost reflexive responses to the characters and their accusations. The more I found myself &quot;believing&quot; one or the other, the more I forced myself to look at why I made such judgments in the absence of any real evidence. That became what the film was all about for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. I was surprised to find that I was so drawn into the film and so caught up in my almost reflexive responses to the characters and their accusations. The more I found myself &#8220;believing&#8221; one or the other, the more I forced myself to look at why I made such judgments in the absence of any real evidence. That became what the film was all about for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Everleth</title>
		<link>http://parallax-view.org/2008/12/22/in-praise-of-doubt-in-the-certainty-of-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Everleth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parallax-view.org/?p=1103#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. I gave up on reading reviews of &quot;Doubt&quot; for exactly what you say in your first paragraph. I thought the film was terrific and got sick of all the comparisons to the play that I didn&#039;t and will never see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. I gave up on reading reviews of &#8220;Doubt&#8221; for exactly what you say in your first paragraph. I thought the film was terrific and got sick of all the comparisons to the play that I didn&#8217;t and will never see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

